Thursday, January 13, 2011

Home Inspection Claims and the Legal System

If you read home inspection industry message boards with any level of fidelity, you cannot fail to notice a general lack of confidence in our legal system among home inspectors. They never expect to get a fair shake in court. And especially in Small Claims Court.

To someone who has spent most of his adult life upholding the legal system, I find this overarching despondency troubling. And quite unwarranted in my experience. Nevertheless, I completely understand why home inspectors feel that way.

In the overwhelming majority of cases against home inspectors that I have handled, claimants and their lawyers are not only constantly vastly overestimating the level of their damages, they do not even recognize that they do not have a case in the first place. While I am not surprised that claimants might make those mistakes, I am continuingly astonished that their attorneys do.

As I stress in the Law and Disorder Seminar, the only cases that actually get to trial are those that are being erroneously evaluated by one or more parties and/or their lawyers. Either the plaintiff thinks that the case is worth a lot more than it actually is or the defendant thinks that it is worth a lot less than it actually is. If a case is being properly evaluated on the basis of established incontrovertible facts, it should either settle or be abandoned.

In my practice, I represent both plaintiffs and defendants and my cardinal rule when representing plaintiffs is this: I do not take plaintiff cases that a. I am not going to win and b. do not have enormous damages. That’s one for the “Duh File”, right? You would be surprised.

As an attorney, when representing a plaintiff, what you want to do is send a demand letter and get a check back by return mail. That is why demand letters from attorneys always stress that you should turn the letter over to your insurance carrier. They don’t want to deal with you, they want to deal with the guy who is going to roll over and send them a check. And if they can send a check that is within your deductible, well, it really doesn’t get better than that for an insurance claim examiner.

So hearing from me, rather than a claims examiner with a checkbook, really gums up the works. Fortunately, when I advise claimants’ attorneys that they do not have a case, generally for a litany of compelling reasons, for the most part their reaction is one of gratitude that I have spared them the trouble of pursuing a worthless claim.

6 comments:

  1. Hi. Greetings. This post is really good and blog is really interesting. It gives good details.

    Home Inspection

    ReplyDelete
  2. When it comes to the safety of the homeowner and its family, getting a fake building inspector will somehow lead to a false building inspection results thereby, misleading the client and exposing them to great danger due to unseen building faults.

    Building Inspectors Adelaide

    ReplyDelete
  3. Purchasing a new home is very exciting time and we have to earn a lot of money while buying home so that we have to take help of home inspector.

    Rolling hills Estates Home Inspector Service

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciate an unbelievable submit, would study your others topics. i appreciate your thoughts for this, I really felt somewhat made an impact to by this short article

    Structural Engineer Wellington

    ReplyDelete
  5. The executive team makes him an offer for a long-term, possibly permanent, relocation, and John accepts. Problem solved, right? The right man is in the right position to get the new product out without a glitch.

    Packers and Movers in Jaipur

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is a truly good site post. Not too many people would actually, the way you just did. I am really impressed that there is so much information about this subject that have been uncovered and you’ve done your best, with so much class. If wanted to know more about green smoke reviews, than by all means come in and check our stuff. Springfield home inspection

    ReplyDelete